You are currently browsing articles tagged publicis.
Sean Boyle, a really smart Publicis brand planner, once told me good brand strategies offer a poetic appeal. To understand his point, I suspect it is much easier to look at a brand strategy and notice a lack of poetry than is to articulate a poetic frame. I’ve tried poetry. When my pops died, I wrote one. Following powerful relationships, others. They weren’t “There once was a man from Nantucket” ditties, they were home-grown and from the heart. Without rhyme or perfect tempo. They were my tempo.
Poetry and what is poetic is in the eyes of the beholder I reckon, so Sean’s notion about good strategy will be different to each planner. But let’s agree to say poetic ideas are pregnant ideas. And dimensional. Ideas that strike up emotion. Certainly they can provide rational context — it is the real world after all. Perhaps this is why “storytelling” is such a pop marketing topic of the day. But storytelling and the journey and all that other brand-speak, is only as good at the strategy that gave it birth. Only as good as the morals of those stories. “A closer shave” is not poetic, “a softer rough” just might be. Peace.
Tags: brand planner, poetry in notion, poetry in planning, pop marketing, publicis, razor blade strategy, Sean boyle, storytelling, whats the idea, whatstheidea
Omnicom and Publicis agreed over the weekend to merge. Como se unexpected? The story even made front page of The New York Times. The spin was all about big data. More people, more devices, more messages. And the best way to reach all these things is through smart use of earned, owned and rented data.
Data companies are finding new and exciting ways to track people. And it’s only just beginning. Home thermostat apps can indicate when a person is at home, road side cameras can log when a license place passes a dinner, voice activation apps can capture when a body needs a sushi fix.
When I pitch Twitch Point Planning to marketers and their agents I explain the offer in three words: understand, map and manipulate. Big data feeds the understand and map components. Capture and organize data. But as David Droga rightly says in the article on the merger (last para.), someone has to do something smart with the data. (When everyone has the understand and map tools, data will just become a commodity.) And that’s the subtext not covered in the Times article. Ad agencies are best at creating the manipulative message. Not bad manipulation, but good. Important. Heartfelt and personal. Dare I say poetic.
I agree that marketers will do understand and map in-house. But the manipulation part, they can’t do well. For this, even for a one-on-one mobile phone ad, they need professionals. If you want to follow the money, this merger is about good old fashion creative, not chunking data. It bodes well for agencies of all size and stripe. Peace!
Tags: "understand map and manipulate", data chunking, data chunks, David droga, omnicom, publicis, the new york times, twitch point planning
The minute I saw my first piece of Banksy’s graffiti art I knew it was art. Art is very personal. I have used many Banksy pieces as Twitter backgrounds. (Much obliged, sir. Sir?)
Many talk about the art of marketing, brand planning and advertising. But today l prefer to talk about the in. Art has a very meaningful place in marketing. Like the beautiful, style-happy person you pass on the street and can’t keep your eyes off, an artful photo, turn of phrase, or video edit captures the viewer’s imagination. And once the imagination is captured and the senses are a tingle – the door to the heat and mind are open.
What the marketer does with that open door is the critical next step. Sell too hard and the consumer loses the warmies. Sell without context and the viewer is confused. Opt not to sell at all and you become the disaffected artist in the SOHO gallery who cares not.
What the marketer does with that open door depends on the art itself and the brand plan. It’s complicated. When Citibank, in its lovely “cliff climber” TV spot, shares that amazing climbing sequence and the poetic card purchases that enabled the climb — “And what girl wouldn’t want new shoes?,” there is mad connection. The art is visual. It’s athletic. Unseen. That’s art in marketing. Not of marketing. Peace!
(The Citibank spot is by Publicis, I believe.)
Tags: Advertising, banksy, brand plan, Brand Planning, Citibank, graffiti art, marketing, publicis, selling, SOHO galleries, twitter, whats the idea, whatstheidea
Right now, T-Mobile’s advertising is the best in the category. The way it integrates print, TV and web is beautiful, the art direction is constant, and spokesperson Carly Foulkes has been managed brilliantly. Never tarted up, always positive, always girl next door, Ms, Foulkes and agency Publicis Seattle are building a place in our brains for this price shopper 4G mobile brand.
As ubiquitous as this advertising is, it’s not Geico annoying. Not AT&T message meandering or Verizon techno mappish. It’s a clean, retail brand imprint and it’s beginning to work.
Creative advertising dudes (less so dudettes) will snark at this comment saying the work is as creative as chipped nail polish, but from a brand management point of view, in a muddled market, this work is moving phones. And T-Mobile doesn’t even have an iPhone.
Imagine if T-Mobile changed its spokesperson every couple of ads. Or tried to compete with Verizon by employed a lot of red in its color palette. Or rather than hammer home price it showed all the cool phone innovations (okay, they do a bit of that on TV).
If the AT&T purchase goes through next year, don’t be surprised to see BBDO morph the campaign Ms. Foulkes way. They won’t cut over using the Magenta color the way they did using Cingular orange, but they know enough to keep the price work clean. Or we might just see Publicis hold the retail business and cede network and inno to BBDO.
T-Mobile has organized its brand and kept to the plan. That’s why its numbers are creeping up! Peace.
Tags: advertising. Mobile advertising, at&t, bbdo, carly foulkes, cingular, geico, publicis, T-Mobile, t-mobile advertising, Verizon Wireless, whats the idea, whatstheidea
I say brand plan you say________? Right. No one really knows what a brand plan looks like. That’s not to say Proctor and Gamble and L’Oreal don’t have brand plans. Or that Publicis, Ogilvy or Crispin Porter don’t have them. They do. But what they’re called and how they are organized are all quite different.
Brand Strategy Statement.
My brand plans are simple to understand. They contain a brand strategy statement which I tell clients is a suit strategy. It’s not very catchy, not creative or tagline-worthy, but it tends to hit the CMO and CEO right in the solar plexus. It may be contextual and/or contain metaphor but it’s certainly a quick, decisive statement of the brand value.
Beneath this simple statement are three planks. Brand planks. Borrowed from Bill Clinton’s first election campaign when the mantra was “It’s the economy stupid,” a brand plank is a product development and messaging directive. My planning process begins with the gathering of formation. Then I boil it down into its most powerful, tasty flavors and those flavors became the planks. Of course, I make sure the planks are key consumer care-abouts and key company strengths (or potential, attainable strengths).
But lately I’ve been analyzing the planks to see if they share any formula for success. Thinking about what makes good brand planks before I fill the stock pot with data and get sidetracked is (sorry Bud Cadell) what consumes me.
I haven’t gotten there yet but here’s a quick start:
One plank should educate (it’s what leaders do). One plank should engage (motivate preference). And one plank should personalize (create a personally meaningful connection between the brand and consumer — bring the consumer closer to the brand).
This stuff is mapping the branding genome hard. Or not. But when I finish, it’s going to be exciting. Peace!
Tags: Brand architecture, brand plan, Brand Planning, bud cadell, crispin porter bogusky, L’Oreal, mapping the genome, Ogilvy, Proctor and Gamble, publicis, what consumes me, whats the idea, whatstheidea
MDC Partners is a marketing services holding company with a brand strategy. That’s right, they have an idea. IPG doesn’t, though back in the day one might have assigned them “entrepreneurship.” WPP, Publicis, and Omnicom don’t have ideas, though perhaps at one point Omnicom might have owned “creative.” At holding companies the powers that be feel brand strategies are not really needed.
MDC Partners owns talent. “Where great talent lives” is their idea. For some, that might be a platitude or poesy but for Miles Nadal, CEO, it’s a real strategy. As a practice, MDC does not own a majority stake in its companies, it owns 49%. This insures that great talent will stick around. Their hands-off approach also insures that the talent stays great. Though I only know Mr. Nadal through his actions and deeds his focus is solely on the leaders he hires, not their output. Any person who has been around this business knows managing people is easier than managing work output. Talent is what drives great marketing. The talent to see what sells, the talent to package it, and the talent to promote it has driven the business since soap suds. Never mind if that talent is traditional, digital, mobile or whatever’s next. (What could possibly be next?)
MDC Partners stock grew last year while every other holding company’s tanked. Campaigns come and go and talent comes and goes, but in the marketing world “talent” is a powerful idea. Peace!
Tags: advertising holding companies, Brand Strategy, ipg, marketing services, MDC partners, Miles Nadal, omnicom, publicis, talent, whats the idea, whatstheidea, wpp
Joel Ewanich landed at GM with guns blazing. GM’s new marketing head left a similar job at Nissan without having been there long enough to find the coffee machine. And his first act at General Motors was to replace Campbell-Ewald and Publicis with Goodby Silversten and Partners as Chevrolet’s agency of record.
Many of the snarks are saying “Why not hold a review?” and “He never even met with the old agencies” but the reality is Mr. Ewanich knows Goodby from their time together on Hyundai, be wanted Goodby, and he is in a hurry. If he wants Goodby, why pretend to put the business up for review and waste everbody’s time and money? Whether this decision turns out to change the market share for Chevrolet is still to be played out but I’ll give Mr. Ewanich credit for strong leadership. He didn’t vacillate publically or do the politically correct thing — he made a decision and is getting to work.
Goodby is a great shop. It knows consumers. Gareth Kay was the planning leader at Modernista when Hummer was humming. I don’t know Mr. Ewanich from Adam and though the Hyundai advertising may not have been crazy memorable, it absolutely delivered solid marketing ideas and results. This move makes sense to me. But as fast as it was done, it can be undone. We learned that already. Peace!
Tags: Campbell-ewald, Chevrolet, gareth kay, general motors, GM advertising, goodby silverstein and partners, Hummer, Joel Ewanich, modernista, nissan, publicis, whats the idea, whatstheidea