You are currently browsing articles tagged claim and proof array.
Storytelling is big in marketing today. One flavor espoused by Co-Collective CEO Ty Montague is called Story Doing, a smart improvement. I’m a fan-boy of doing rather than telling.
HOWEVER. And with me there is always a however when it comes to brand. However, a word that trumps “story” is “strategy.” Using Mr. Montague’s construct then, a more active and effective form of brand building is Strategy Doing…inelegant though it may sound. Strategy Doing is the fastest way to build brands.
I love a good story. It can be captivating. And memorable. But unless the story adds value to the brand, unless it moves the ball farther upfield with regard to the brand claim and proof array, it may no more helpful than the Three Little Pigs.
Story telling good. Story doing, better. Strategy Doing, bestestest!
Tags: claim and proof, claim and proof array, Co:Collective, Story doing, story telling in branding, storytelling in marketing, three litt;le pigs, Ty Montague, whats the idea, whatstheidea
There are some in the advertising business who believe brand strategy is limiting. They use pejorative terms for brand strategists like “brand police.” (Not that there’s anything pejorative about police.) When a brand strategy is seen as confining, most often by creative people at agencies, the belief is that brand strategists are conditioned to say “no.” And it’s true to a degree; good brand manager wants deposits in the brand bank.
Brand strategy needs to be shared with creative teams and content builders well before the creative process begins. Not on the eve of the job. Creators need to understand the claim and proof array that is brand strategy, then they need to sleep on it and live with it. Brand strategy done right is like fly paper. It captures ideas over time. There is nothing more freeing when ideating than having an articulatable goal. A goal beyond simple engagement and recall.
If you have a creative team working on an assignment, brief them early. Engage them over time. Let the strategy percolate. Then set them free on an assignment. You’ll up your potential for “yes.”
Tags: brand strategy definition, claim and proof, claim and proof array, fly paper brand strategy, fly paper strategy, flypaper brand strategy, Flypaper strategy, whats the idea, whatstheidea
In a nutshell, my framework for brand strategy can be described as “one claims and three proof planks.” What’s a proof plank? It’s a series of like-minded examples or proofs. Tangible, intelligible evidence. If I make a claim I am strong, proof of that claim is me picking up 300 pounds. When a restaurant says the food tastes good, you trot out the James Beard Award of its chef. A proof plank is tied inexorably to the brand claim and contains a list of proofs.
This is where most brand building falls down. Lack of proof.
Many brand nerds will tell you that brand success lies in understanding and promoting brand “Values” and/or “Attributes.” Values and attributes are the false Gods of branding. They sound good in meetings. Present well in analytics presentations. They are even measurable for infatuated data heads. Don’t get me wrong, I’ve build brands by doting on research report attributes. But the fastest way to positive attribute movement is through proof. The advertising business is infected with copy that is insubstantial. Copy filled with sing-songy value blather. Filled with empty adjectives.
Stick to proof, find your claim and proof array, and then you will have a real marketing job.
Tags: 1 claim and 3 proof planks, brand attributes, Brand Strategy, brand strategy framework, Brand values, claim and proof array, one claim and three proof planks, simple brand strategy framework
I’ve been reading a lot about Artificial Intelligence, self-driving cars and trucks, brick layers whose jobs are in jeopardy because of robots….and that’s just in today’s paper. As a brand planner I have to admit it makes me a bit giddy to think about what the art of branding will be like when things are more automated. I suspect there will be more compliance. The biggest hurdle to compliance when it comes to following brand strategy is, ta-dah, the people. The creative brain. The need to problem solve in one’s own unique way.
Coloring outside the lines in brand strategy doesn’t work. Its s slippery slope. Brand managers get sidetracked. They see something shiny and skirt away from the claim and proof array that is their brand’s organizing principle. SEO and Adwords might go off on a tangent that spikes sales. A new TV campaign might hit the front page of Vice. Little marketing tickles that cause a brand to veer.
Machines won’t let that happen. They are relentless. Machine learning is focused…and relentless.
Kind of stoked. Peace.
Tags: adwords, brand managers, Brand Strategy, brand strategy compliance, c;aim and proof, claim and proof array, machine learning and brand strategy, vice, whats the idea, whatstheidea
I’m not against storytelling. It’s an important part of my business. When collecting information to build brand strategy I hunt for stories and often tell stories to get others to open up. But in and of itself, a story won’t do shit for a brand. Especially, if it’s off-piste.
Storytelling is a pop marketing topic many brand consultants rest upon. My “brand-ar” goes off when I hear someone use the term; it suggests they’re blowing marko-babble smoke.
Think of storytelling as the code and brand strategy as the app. The app being the meaningful, useful tool.
Brand strategy done right is about claim and proof — packaged into a discrete organizing principle for product, experience and messaging.
Stories and storytelling are communications tools, not strategy tools.
Tags: Brand-ar, claim and proof, claim and proof array, marko-babble, off-piste, one claim and three proof planks, organizing principle for product experience and messaging, story telling in branding, story telling in marketing, storytelling in branding, storytelling in marketing, whats the idea, whatstheidea
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center is one of the greatest healthcare organizations in the world. Perhaps the greatest. As a result, it has also become a powerful, powerful brand. It is exactly what it is…and lives up to the brand claim “the best cancer care anywhere.” Its words spread through stories and proof. Patients and caregivers syphon proof off their experiences and share. (Branding revolves around “claim” and “proof.”)
A couple of years ago MSKCC appointed new advertising agency Pereira O’Dell. I complimented the shop and client on the new brand strategy claim “More Science. Less Fear.” Having worked in healthcare branding for a long time, studying the claim and proof arrays of the top area hospital systems (disclosure: I penned one of those strategies), I rubbed my hands together in anticipation of some good work to follow.
This past week I was listening to an MSKCC radio spot and was disappointed to hear talk about serving the “mind, body and soul” of patients. This type of copy is what you’d expect from a religious-based group or a second tier hospital. From a system that can’t differentiate based on the science. This ad hurt MSKCC in two ways. It didn’t deliver on the brand promise, wasting money, time and resources, but more importantly it dumbed down the sanctity of the brand, making MSKCC peddlers of healthcare marko-babble like many others.
If anyone can educate the populace about the science of cancer care, using real proof, it’s Memorial.
This isn’t that hard. Find your claim and prove it every day.
Tags: claim and proof, claim and proof array, find your claim and prove it every day, marko-babble, memorial sloan kettering brand strategy., Memorial sloan kettering cancer center, more science less fear, MSKCC brand strategy, Pereira O'Dell, sloan kettering
Can a brand be strategic or must strategy be left to the brand managers? Save for machines, inanimate things can’t do animate things. However, by recasting the What’s The Idea? tagline, to include “Brand managers come and go…a powerful brand strategy is indelible,” I offer that a brand can be strategic.
In Kansas City many moons ago while exposing ads to consumers for the launch of WorldWorx videoconferencing service, a focus group participant claimed “That’s not an AT&T ad. AT&T would never speak to me that way.” Ad dead. Brand strategy alive and well.
People are the best administers of brand strategy yet they are fallible. Only when brand strategy is truly codified and attached to a product does it begin to grow in brand value. One claim and three proofs planks is how one builds a brand strategy. It’s how a brand sustains — in deeds, actions, messaging and, even, offering itself.
If your brand cannot be articulated via this simple claim and proof array, it’s not strategic. The people are. Bad berries.
Tags: AT&T Worldworx, Brand Strategy, claim and proof array, one claim and three proof planks, strategic brands, what to brand managers do, whats the idea, whatstheidea
One of the goals of What’s The Idea? is to create for clients explicit guidance for “product, experience and messaging.” It’s not easy but it’s doable. The real hard part is turning that explicit brand strategy into implicit company actions. Brand actions, behaviors and deeds enculturated through the company or brand group are the Holy Grail. When this happens consumers learn and follow. As brand strategy permeates a company and the using masses, brands begin to thrive. You can feel it.
Brand strategy training is a key component of brand management. When the receptionist knows the brand claim and proof array (3 proof planks) and is able to espouse and act on it as well as the CEO and CMO, we have lift off.
When explicit turns implicit, we have brand lift off.
Tags: brand lift off, Brand Strategy, brand strategy proof planks, brand strategy training, claim and proof array, cmo, explicit and implicit brand strategy enculturated brand strategy, proof planks, whats the idea, whatstheidea
I was reading an ad this morning with the headline “Deeds not words.” If any words define What’s The Idea?, they are these. Alas, it is “words” that I sell. I sell brand briefs. I sell strategic plans. Words on paper. But…
My brand planning due diligence is all about “deeds.” Deeds are the actions that yield outcomes. Outcomes are where many planners spend their time. “We’re number 1. Low cost provider. In business for 35 years.” Outcomes are fine but they are the result of deeds. Once I’ve collected enough deeds, the claim (brand promise) begins to emerge.
I’ve written before about getting to the claim by first finding the proof. Or assembling proof clusters first. But proof can be a step removed from a deed. Proof can be an outcome or a result. It’s better to start with deeds. Nothing in marketing (or life) starts without deeds. Physical actions, investments, actualized promises from a brand put money and psychic investment in play. It’s existential.
This is where words stop and how brands are built. Peace.
Tags: brand planners, claim and proof, claim and proof array, deed in brand planning, Deeds not words, existentializm in branding, whats the idea, whatstheidea
In the part of my brand strategy presentation where I lay out my framework (1 claim, 3 proof planks), I talk about the many targets a brand must address. With B2B products, the targets tend to be job or function-related. For a healthcare service, as an example, I might want the brand to speak to patients, docs, care-givers and insurance companies. This adds complexity when it comes to finding the claim. On the consumer side of the house, the targets are often consumer segments.
I was reading about a Starbucks barista in Williamsburg Brooklyn this morning and how he is one of group of highly skilled Howard Schultz employees, dialing up the flavor selections of artisanal brews, soon to be released under the “Roastery” name — coffee draughts which may list for as high as $10. The Williamsburg drinkers of this high-end coffee are not the bulk of the Starbucks buyers around the country; they’re not part of the double, double, half hazelnut, half vanilla, two sugars, muffin top set. A group that pays the bills.
So how does one brand cater to both targets with a single Starbucks brand? Without, sorry for the pun, diluting the brew? Well, the brand has to be future proof. It has to have a claim and proof plan array that appeals to all segments. Though I am not privy to the Starbucks brand strategy, I know it’s accommodating. It will handle the Roastery and the mixed coffee drink crowd. Starbucks has a brand strategy that encompasses. That includes. But also focuses. Starbucks has mad blending skills.
Tags: 1 claim and 3 proofs planks, claim and proof array, howard schultz, multiple brand targets, starbucks, the roaster, whats the idea, whatstheidea